Well, I certainly didn’t like what I read about CML.

I used my limited background in Bioinformatics to search the web and Medline, and I don’t like the outcomes (i.e. survival rates) I saw. I’ve read enough papers in chemistry and molecular genetics to know where to look for the bad news. I’m going to ignore them for now.

I’m still hoping that they’re mistaken even after three blood tests and I just have Lyme disease. Or syphilis. OK, not syphilis. How about Lyme disease?

2 thoughts on “Well, I certainly didn’t like what I read about CML.”

  1. Hey, remember Baye’s law from statistics? If the odds of a true positive are low, your chances of getting a false positive result(even if the test is really, really accurate) is really high. So it’s totally possible that all three blood tests were wrong.

  2. umm…you’re fine! Do not read anything or you’ll drive yourself loco!! Where are you getting your tests done and who is your doc?

Comments are closed.